top of page

A Quick Refresher
on
In-House vs Third Party
The Good and
The Not-So-Good

Foodservice delivery platforms like Uber Eats, DoorDash, and Grubhub have historically used a variety of strategies to incentivize restaurants to partner with them, even though the associated fees can be high. Here are some of the key approaches. (3 min read)

The Good

1. Increased Visibility and Reach

  • Marketing Boost: Platforms often feature restaurants in promotions, "featured" sections, or as part of campaigns for new customers. This can result in significantly increased exposure.

  • Access to New Customers: By partnering with delivery services, restaurants gain access to a broader audience they might not have otherwise reached, including those who prioritize convenience and digital ordering.

2. Operational Convenience

  • Logistics Support: These services handle the entire delivery process, allowing restaurants to avoid investing in their own drivers and infrastructure.

  • Technology Solutions: Delivery platforms provide order management tools that integrate with point-of-sale (POS) systems, simplifying operations.

  • Data Analytics: Restaurants can use insights provided by the platforms, such as sales trends and customer preferences, to improve menu offerings and pricing strategies.

3. Revenue Growth Opportunities

  • Incremental Sales: Partnering with delivery services often brings incremental sales from customers who wouldn't have dined in.

  • Special Promotions: Delivery apps sometimes fund special deals (e.g., "$10 off your first order") that benefit the restaurant without requiring upfront investment.

4. Flexible Fee Structures

  • Tiered Commission Plans: Some platforms now offer flexible fee tiers, allowing restaurants to choose lower commission rates in exchange for reduced services like less prominent placement.

  • Revenue-Sharing Incentives: Restaurants may negotiate discounts or rebates on commissions based on sales volume or performance metrics.

5. Branding and Marketing

  • Co-Branding Opportunities: Platforms offer branding opportunities, such as custom landing pages and joint marketing campaigns.

  • Social Media Integration: Delivery services often amplify restaurant promotions on their social channels.

6. Operational and Financial Relief

  • Equipment Grants or Discounts: Some platforms offer equipment or setup assistance to encourage onboarding.

  • Reduced Onboarding Fees: Platforms sometimes waive setup fees for new restaurant partners or provide initial financial incentives.

7. Partnership for White-Label Solutions

  • Direct Ordering Tools: Some platforms now provide white-label solutions allowing restaurants to take orders directly through their own websites while still relying on the platform for delivery.

8. Exclusive Opportunities

  • Exclusivity Deals: Some platforms offer reduced fees or premium positioning in exchange for exclusivity agreements.

  • Priority Access: Restaurants agreeing to certain terms might be highlighted during high-demand times, such as lunch or dinner rush.

While these incentives can make partnering attractive, the high commission fees and potential loss of customer data often lead restaurants to carefully weigh the benefits against the costs.

The Not-So-Good

The costs of partnering with foodservice delivery platforms like Uber Eats, DoorDash, or Grubhub can be substantial, both in direct financial terms and in other impacts on a restaurant's operations and brand. Here’s a breakdown:

Financial Costs

  1. Commissions

    • Typical Rates: Platforms often charge commissions ranging from 15% to 30% per order, depending on the service level (e.g., delivery vs. pickup, promotional placement).

    • Impact on Profit Margins: Restaurants with thin profit margins (typically 5-10% in the industry) may see little to no profit from delivery orders after commission fees.

  2. Setup Fees

    • Some platforms charge initial setup fees for onboarding, menu digitization, or technology integration.

  3. Transaction Fees

    • A percentage of the total order value or flat fees for processing payments through the platform.

  4. Marketing Costs

    • Promotions and Discounts: Restaurants often pay for participation in promotional campaigns or special discounts to boost visibility.

    • Preferred Listings: Additional fees for better positioning on the app (e.g., featured or sponsored listings).

  5. Loss of Revenue

    • Cannibalization of Dine-In Sales: Customers who would have dined in at a lower cost to the restaurant may instead order delivery.

    • High-Volume Orders: Even when sales increase, profits may not scale due to the commission fees.

Operational Costs

Increased Complexity

  1. Packaging and Delivery Costs

    • Restaurants must invest in quality packaging to ensure food arrives in good condition, which can be expensive.

    • Additional staffing or kitchen space may be needed to handle the influx of delivery orders.

  2. Reduced Control

    • The restaurant has limited oversight over delivery quality, speed, and customer service provided by the platform, which can lead to dissatisfaction and complaints.

Brand and Customer Relationship Costs

  1. Loss of Direct Customer Connection

    • Restaurants lose access to valuable customer data (e.g., names, preferences, contact info) that platforms retain for their own use.

    • The intermediary platform becomes the face of the customer relationship, diluting the restaurant’s brand identity.

  2. Potential Brand Damage

    • Poor delivery experiences, such as delays or incorrect orders, can harm the restaurant’s reputation, even if the issues are the platform’s fault.

  3. Dependency

    • Heavy reliance on third-party platforms can make a restaurant vulnerable to changes in fee structures or policies. Restaurants may feel compelled to stay on platforms to avoid losing customers.

Regulatory and Legal Costs

  1. Compliance Issues

    • Restaurants may face new regulatory requirements, such as ensuring delivery personnel comply with local food handling laws.

    • Legal disputes or liabilities arising from third-party delivery drivers (e.g., accidents) can add risk.

  2. Exclusivity Agreements

    • Entering into exclusive partnerships can limit a restaurant’s ability to diversify its delivery options, reducing flexibility.

Social and Ethical Costs

  1. Impact on Employees

    • Delivery orders often demand more from the kitchen staff, potentially leading to burnout or dissatisfaction if workloads aren’t balanced with compensation.

    • Front-of-house staff may lose tips due to reduced dine-in traffic.

  2. Community Perception

    • Some consumers and industry professionals criticize platforms for their impact on small businesses. Partnering with these services can create tensions with customers who prioritize supporting independent businesses directly.

Strategies to Mitigate Costs

Many restaurants are attempting to offset these costs by:

  • Offering direct online ordering with in-house delivery to avoid high commissions.

  • Negotiating lower fees with platforms based on sales volume.

  • Diversifying marketing efforts to maintain direct customer engagement.

Balancing the costs and benefits is critical, particularly for smaller operations.

FFM

bottom of page